Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Testing in New York 2011-2022 Reveals Increase in Non-O157 Identifications.

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are an important cause of bacterial enteric infection. STEC strains cause serious human gastrointestinal disease, which may result in life-threatening complications such as hemolytic uremic syndrome. They have the potential to impact public health due to diagnostic challenges of identifying non-O157 strains in the clinical laboratory. The Wadsworth Center (WC), the public health laboratory of the New York State Department of Health, has isolated and identified non-O157 STEC for decades. A shift from initially available enzyme immunoassay testing to culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) has increased the uptake of testing at clinical microbiology laboratories. This testing change has resulted in an increased number of specimen submissions to WC. During a 12-year period between 2011 and 2022, WC received 5037 broths and/or stool specimens for STEC confirmation from clinical microbiology laboratories. Of these, 3992 were positive for Shiga toxin genes (stx1 and/or stx2) by real-time PCR. Furthermore, culture methods were utilized to isolate, identify, and characterize 2925 STEC from these primary specimens. Notably, WC observed a >200% increase in the number of STEC specimens received in 2021-2022 compared with 2011-2012 and an 18% increase in the number of non-O157 STEC identified using the same methodologies. During the past decade, the WC testing algorithm has been updated to manage the increase in specimens received, while also navigating the novel COVID-19 pandemic, which took priority over other testing for a period of time. This report summarizes updated methods for confirmation, surveillance, and outbreak detection of STEC and describes findings that may be related to our algorithm updates and the increased use of CIDTs, which is starting to elucidate the true incidence of non-O157 STEC.

Performance evaluation of antibody-based point-of-care devices intended for the identification of immune responses to SARS-CoV-2.

The novel coronavirus outbreak caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in December of 2019 in Wuhan, China. The local outbreak quickly rose to pandemic level that has spread to more than 188 countries with more than 19 million cases and 732,467 deaths worldwide. The current recommendation for testing is RT-PCR based tests of nasopharyngeal or alternatively nasal- and/or oropharyngeal swabs that detects infection with SARS-CoV-2 to diagnose acute infection. However, there is an urgent need for a quick and accurate antibody-based point-of-care test method to quickly identify evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among people who might be missed through active case finding and surveillance efforts. Serology tests measure the presence of antibodies in serum after infection. Here we compared the performance characteristics of 6 commercially available antibody-based point-of-care devices and their potential for identification of individuals infected at some time by SARS-CoV-2.

Using the quality improvement cycle on clinical indicators--improve or remove?

The variable life-adjusted display is a graphical, statistical methodology used in Queensland to monitor patient outcomes of clinical indicators. The quality improvement cycle is a systematic approach employed by patient safety and quality programs worldwide to improve patient care. The quality improvement cycle is beneficial to the review and refinement of indicator definitions. Indicators with definitional issues that are not subject to the quality improvement cycle may initially prompt quality improvement opportunities, but are more likely to potentially lead to unnecessary chart and clinical reviews, which will disengage coders and clinicians. Queensland recently used the quality improvement cycle to refine the laparoscopic cholecystectomy complications of surgery indicator definition and several maternity definitions.